Patent License Single
Patent License Single
![]() |
No items matching your keywords were found.
Quanta Computer V. LG Electronics: Reviving Exhaustion, Applying it to Method Patents
Background
LG Electronics ("LGE") owns the rights to several computer technology patents, all of which describe a computer operation or method, not actual products. LGE licensed these patents to Intel Corporation in a License Agreement that authorizes Intel to manufacture and sell microprocessors and chipsets that use and incorporate the LGE patents. LGE and Intel had a separate agreement ("Master Agreement") that required Intel to give its customers written notice that the license does not extend to a product made by combining an Intel Product with a non-Intel product. The Master Agreement states that breach of it does not affect the integrity and terms of the License Agreement.
Quanta purchased microprocessors and chipsets from Intel, and then manufactured computers using the Intel parts in combination with non-Intel parts, but without modifying the Intel parts. LGE sued Quanta, claiming this combination infringed the LGE patents. Quanta claimed that LGE's patents were exhausted when Intel sold Quanta the parts that embodied LGE's patent and therefore LGE has no further rights.
The District Court initially granted summary judgment in favor of Quanta, but upon reconsideration, denied the summary judgment on the grounds that the exhaustion doctrine does not apply to method patents. The Federal Circuit agreed that the patent exhaustion does not apply to method patents, and alternatively found that LGE did not license Intel to sell the Intel products to Quanta to combine with non-Intel products.
The United States Supreme Court heard the case on January 16, 2008 and issued its opinion, reversing the Federal Circuit and finding in favor of Quanta, on June 9, 2008.
The doctrine of patent exhaustion and its history pre-Quanta
The basic concept of patent exhaustion means that the first authorized sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item. Quanta, 128 S.Ct. at 2115. The doctrine is premised on the notion that a patentee is entitled to a single royalty - in authorizing that first sale, the patentee presumably has bargained for and received the value of the patent right. The Supreme Court has explained that the touchstone of the patent exhaustion doctrine is "whether or not there has been such a disposition of the article that it may fairly be said that the patentee has received his reward for the use of the article." United States v. Masonite Corp., 316 U.S. 265, 278 (1942).
In the early 1900's, some courts allowed patentees to place post-sale restrictions on their patents that enabled them to exercise control (and receive additional royalties) in the downstream chain, long after the initial authorized sale. Quanta, 128 S.Ct. at 2115-2116. But by 1917, the Supreme Court made it clear that such post-sale restrictions would not be tolerated. In Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg Co., 243 U.S. 502, 516 (1917), the court held that "the right to vend is exhausted by a single, unconditional sale, the article sold being thereby carried outside the monopoly of the patent law and rendered free of every restriction which the vendor may attempt to put upon it."
Prior to Quanta, the Supreme Court's most recent and important precedent on the exhaustion doctrine, including its application to components and method patents, was United States v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241 (1942). In Univis, the patentee (Univis Corp.) held a patent with claims directed to an eyeglass lens and the method for making lenses by producing, grinding and polishing lens blanks. Univis Corp. licensed its related company, Univis Lens, to manufacture lens blanks.
Univis Lens sold the licensed blanks to wholesalers and retailers who would finish the grinding and polishing of the blanks through practice of Univis' patented method. The licenses to the wholesalers and retailers contained strict post-sale limitations as to whom the lens blanks could be sold and at what price.
The court held that upon Univis' licensed sale of the lens blanks, which had no realistic use except to practice the Univis patent, the patent rights regarding the lens blanks and finished lenses were exhausted. "[T]he authorized sale of an article which is capable of use only in practicing the patent is a relinquishment of the patent monopoly with respect to the article sold." Univis, 316 U.S. at 249.
The Court stated:
"The first vending of any article manufactured under a patent puts the article beyond the reach of the monopoly which that patent confers. Whether the licensee sells the patented article in its complete form or sells it before completion for the purpose of enabling the buyer to finish and sell it, he has equally parted with the article, and made it the vehicle for transferring to the buyer ownership of the invention with respect to that article. To that extent he has parted with his patent monopoly in either case, and has received in the purchase price every benefit of that monopoly which the patent law secures to him. If he were permitted to control the price at which it could be sold by others he would extend his monopoly quite as much in the one case as in the other, and he would extend it beyond the fair meaning of the patent statutes and the construction which has hitherto been given to them." 316 U.S. at 252.
Despite the Univis holding, however, the Federal Circuit again allowed erosion of the exhaustion doctrine by allowing patentees to place post-sale restrictions and limitations on their patents. The seminal (and often criticized) ruling in Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992), enabled patentees to limit their customers to a significant extent in repairing, refurbishing, recycling and modifying equipment post-sale - a violation of the restriction constituted patent infringement unless the restriction violated another law such as antitrust law. The rationale for the holding: a patent owner bargains for and receives royalties based upon an anticipated and intended use; if the buyer makes other and additional uses out of the patent, the patent owner ought to be able to claim additional royalties for that non-bargained-for use.
The Mallinckrodt decision and its progeny have limited the law of patent exhaustion in various ways - a controversial result. Patent owners have relied upon these cases by drafting license agreements that the Federal Circuit has interpreted as preserving their rights to pursue infringement claims against downstream users who purchase and use the licensed product. Indeed, the Federal Circuit applied this same line of thinking when it affirmed the District Court's ruling against Quanta.(1)
Moreover, since Mallinckrodt, also in seeming contradiction to the Univis holding, the Federal Circuit has held that method claims are not subject to patent exhaustion.(2) The Federal Circuit has severely weakened the exhaustion doctrine by limiting it only to apparatus claims.
Quanta reaffirms Univis and revives the exhaustion doctrine
In its decision in Quanta, the Supreme Court relied heavily upon the precedent of Univis and conclusively held that the exhaustion doctrine does apply to method claims as well as apparatus claims.
The Court stated: "It is true that a patented method may not be sold in the same way as an article or device, but methods nonetheless may be 'embodied' in a product, the sale of which exhausts patent rights." 128 S.Ct. at 2117.
The Court warned that any other result "would seriously undermine the exhaustion doctrine. Patentees seeking to avoid patent exhaustion could simply draft their patent claims to describe a method rather than an apparatus." 128 S.Ct at 2117. This exhaustion-avoidance technique, if it were effective, would wreak havoc on downstream purchasers who could find themselves suddenly liable for patent infringement, unaware that a method encompassed in the product they purchased enjoys an inexhaustible patent.
After confirming that exhaustion applies to method claims, the court explained "the extent to which a product must embody a patent in order to trigger exhaustion." Id. at 2118. Again, the court looked to Univis for guidance, finding that when the licensed product that contains the patented method is really only capable of use when it practices the patented method, exhaustion applies:
"Like the Univis lens blanks, the Intel Products constitute a material part of the patented invention and all but completely practice the [LGE] patent. Here, as in Univis, the incomplete article substantially embodies the patent because the only step necessary to practice the patent is the application of common processes or the addition of standard parts. Everything inventive about each patent is embodied in the Intel Products." 128 S.Ct. at 2120.
LGE argued that exhaustion did not apply because Intel's sale to Quanta was not an "authorized" first sale. LGE asserted that the contractual post-sale restriction it imposed on its patents - namely, that LGE did not license Intel to sell the Intel Products to Quanta to combine with non-Intel products - prevented application of the doctrine. 128 S.Ct. at 2121. The Federal Circuit had agreed with this argument, following the precedent it had created for itself (that parties can contract around exhaustion) over the last 15 years.
But the Supreme Court disagreed. LGE had two separate agreements with Intel: a License Agreement that granted Intel the right to manufacture and sell LGE's patents, and a separate Master Agreement that contained the post-sale restriction. But the Master Agreement specifically stated that its breach did not affect the validity of the License Agreement. As a result, the License Agreement gave Intel the authority to sell its products containing the LGE patent, and that first authorized sale exhausts LGE's patents, regardless of the other agreement. Id. at 2121-2122.
Quanta leaves one imperfectly-answered question
There may be a lingering question about exhaustion when the component that embodies the patent has other non-infringing uses. For example, if the Intel products had thousands of non-infringing uses outside of the patented LGE process, but someone used the Intel product to practice the LGE patent, an argument could be made that exhaustion should not apply and LGE should have the right to pursue and infringement action against that user.
This certainly was not the case in Quanta, as the Intel chips have really no utility, even while embodying the LGE patent, until they are put into a computer and put to use practicing the patent. But what if the chips had numerous other uses, only one of which was to practice the LGE patent? Could exhaustion still apply? The overwhelming precedent indicates that exhaustion would not apply in such circumstances.
But the Quanta opinion includes this curious comment:
"While each Intel microprocessor and chipset practices thousands of individual patents, including some LGE patents not at issue in this case, the exhaustion analysis is not altered by the fact that more than one patent is practiced by the same product. The relevant consideration is whether the Intel Products that partially practice a patent - by, for example, embodying its essential features - exhaust that patent." 128 S.Ct. at 2121.
To the extent that this excerpt might suggest that a patented process can be exhausted even if it is contained in a product with numerous non-infringing uses, we think that is merely erroneous wording by the court. Future cases may clarify the issue more specifically, but the precedent should solidly prevent application of exhaustion in this circumstance.
(1) LG Electronics, Inc. v. Bizcom Electronics Inc., 453 F.3d 1364, 1369-1370 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
(2) See, e.g., Glass Equipment Devel. Inc. v. Besten Inc., 174 F.3d 1337, 1341, n.1 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
About the Author
Mr. Carr is a Counsel at Zuber & Taillieu LLP, where he specializes in patent and trademark prosecution. He earned a J.D. with high honors from Pepperdine University School of Law, and is a member of the California Bar and the U.S. Patent Bar.
|
|
Cisco Cue Timecardview Single User License SWTCVUSER1 $73.2 Cisco Cue Timecardview Single User License SWTCVUSER1 |
|
|
Upg Diskeeper 2010 Professional Single License Pack $40.99 UPG DISKEEPER 2010 PROFESSIONAL SINGLE LICENSE PACK |
|
|
Acad Diskeeper 2010 Professional Single License Pack $47.99 ACAD DISKEEPER 2010 PROFESSIONAL SINGLE LICENSE PACK |
|
|
Reflection X Windows Single License 14.1 Box $395.99 REFLECTION X WINDOWS SINGLE LICENSE 14.1 BOX |
|
|
License $22.99 License |
|
|
Patent Strategy $125 FROM PATENT TO PROFIT Patents and patent strategies are increasingly pertinent to the success of information age businesses, from affecting valuations to gaining tax advantages to increasing the starting price per share when taking a company public. Patent Strategy illustrates the impact patents can have on technology-driven businesses' tactical and strategic efforts. Here is step-by-step guidance to the patent process, the laws, and basic strategies-from a business-goal perspective-so that middle and upper-level managers can recognize the significance of patents in relation to a particular business and can incorporate proper patent management efforts into their business framework. In addition, this book serves as an invaluable reference for management and executives when making patent-related decisions such as whether a patent infringement study must be performed; whether the budget for patent matters should be increased or decreased; whether attempts should be made to license certain patent technology; and whether the firm should sue for patent infringement. Case studies throughout the book give you a specific business context within which to consider the concepts introduced Statistics are presented to assist you in assessing various issues, planning patent strategies, and implementing patent management programs |
|
|
Texas Instruments NSSW/DBX/2L1/2D Software License $227.64 TI-Nspire Single seat License |
|
|
Software Patent $92.4 Software patent. Software patents under United States patent law, Software patents under the European Patent Convention, Software patents under United Kingdom patent law, Patentable subject matter, Software patents and free software, License, Software patents under TRIPs Agreement, Computer programs and the Patent Cooperation Treaty, Proposed directive on the patentability of computerimplemented inventions, Agreement on TradeRelated Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure, Patent Cooperation Treaty, United States Patent and Trademark Office, List of software patents, Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works Author: Miller, Frederic P./ Vandome, Agnes F./ McBrewster, John Binding Type: Paperback Number of Pages: 106 Publication Date: 2009/11/03 Language: English Dimensions: 5.98 x 9.01 x 0.25 inches |
|
|
Drafting Technology Patent License Agreements $287.63 No Synopsis Available |
|
|
Patent Your Idea $32.44 'Patent Your Idea' is a collaboration of knowledge, experience and strategy on current patent law, drafting of patent applications, filing procedures, prior art searches, prosecution of patent applications, assignments and licensing of patents. The book contains sample patent drafts, responses to patent office actions, assignment/ license formats and strategic advice to an inventor on how to get a patent granted. In this book, the authors share their expert knowledge in meticulously protecting and patenting an idea. |
|
|
HP - License ( upgrade license ) - 12 ports - for BLc3000 Enclosure BLc7000 Single-Phase Enclosure BLc7000 Three-Phase Enclosure $5279.99 HP - License ( upgrade license ) - 12 ports - for BLc3000 Enclosure BLc7000 Single-Phase Enclosure BLc7000 Three-Phase Enclosure |
|
|
Patent Ambush $73.28 High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles A patent ambush occurs when a member of a standardsetting organization withholds information, during participation in development and setting a standard, about a patent that the member or the members company owns, has pending, or intends to file, which is relevant to the standard, and subsequently the company asserts that a patent is infringed by use of the standard as adopted.Standardssetting organizations, such as the IEEE and ANSI, typically require each member of their committees engaged in standard setting to file a letter with the organization stating either that the member does not know of any patents of their company relevant to the standard or else identifying those patents about which they know. When the organization is advised of relevant patents, often it will either seek to use a different technology for the standard or obtain a commitment from the patent owner that it will license users of the standard on reasonable and nondiscriminatory ( RAND ) terms. Author: Surhone, Lambert M./ Tennoe, Mariam T./ Henssonow, Susan F. Binding Type: Paperback Number of Pages: 96 Publication Date: 2010/11/20 Language: English Dimensions: 6.00 x 9.02 x 0.23 inches |
|
|
Texas Instruments / TI-Nspire Single Seat License / NSSW/DBX/2L1/2R $96.39 Texas Instruments - TI-Nspire Single Seat License - NSSW/DBX/2L1/2R |
|
|
Cisco Communication Manager 4.x License For Single Cisco 7925G SWCCMUL7925G $140.4 Cisco Communication Manager 4.x License For Single Cisco 7925G SWCCMUL7925G |
|
|
Cisco Unified Cme User License For Single Cisco 7921G SWCCMEUL7921G $140.4 Cisco Unified Cme User License For Single Cisco 7921G SWCCMEUL7921G |
|
|
Cisco Ggsn 7.0 IPv6 Feature License Single Image FLIPV6GG70PIM $8406 Cisco Ggsn 7.0 IPv6 Feature License Single Image FLIPV6GG70PIM |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7906 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7906 $73.2 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7906 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7906 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7911G IP Phone SWCCMEUL7911 $106.8 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7911G IP Phone SWCCMEUL7911 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7931 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7931 $140.4 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7931 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7931 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7936 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7936 $106.8 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7936 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7936 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7940 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7940 $140.4 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7940 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7940 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7960 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7960 $140.4 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7960 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7960 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7961 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7961 $140.4 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7961 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7961 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 3911 IP Phone SWCCMEUL3911 $73.2 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 3911 IP Phone SWCCMEUL3911 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7935 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7935 $106.8 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7935 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7935 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7970 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7970 $174 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7970 IP Phone SWCCMEUL7970 |
|
|
Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7971G IP Phone SWCCMEUL7971G $174 Cisco CallManager Express License For Single 7971G IP Phone SWCCMEUL7971G |
|
|
Cisco And 3PCC Sip And Mgcp License For Single 7960 IP Phone SWSMUL7960 $140.4 Cisco And 3PCC Sip And Mgcp License For Single 7960 IP Phone SWSMUL7960 |
|
|
PANDA CLOUD OFFICE PROTECTION ACTIVATION LICENSE FOR 12 MONTHS SINGLE SEAT $17.99 PANDA CLOUD OFFICE PROTECTION ACTIVATION LICENSE FOR 12 MONTHS SINGLE SEAT |
|
|
Acad Diskeeper 2010 Pro Premier Single License Pack $61.99 ACAD DISKEEPER 2010 PRO PREMIER SINGLE LICENSE PACK |
|
|
Reflection X Windows Single License Upg 14.1 Box $213.99 REFLECTION X WINDOWS SINGLE LICENSE UPG 14.1 BOX |
|
|
Patent It Yourself (Paperback) $62.45 Patent your creation with the world`s bestselling guide to patents!Have a world-class idea? Ready to protect your invention from copycats? Then turn to the best resource available -- Patent It Yourself. Attorney David Pressman takes you through the entire patent process, providing scrupulously updated information and clear instructions to help you: . determine if you can patent your invention . understand patent law . evaluate the commercial potential of your idea . perform your own patent search . file a provisional patent application . prepare a formal patent application . respond to patent examiners . amend an application . enforce and maintain your patent . market and license your invention Thoroughly updated to reflect the latest changes in intellectual property law, this edition provides the latest U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rules and forms. It includes up-to-date discussions of the new "first to file" rule, which promises to revolutionize patent law. Whether you`re new at the inventing game or a grizzled veteran, Patent It Yourself will save you grief, time and money. |
|
|
Billet License Plate Mount $89.99 Cobra Billet License Plate Mount The license plate is probably the single ugliest piece of sheet metal on any bike. At least you can dress it up with a Cobra mount. Remove that ugly OEM license plate mount Matches perfectly with Cobra small frames (Not Included) CNC billet machined and chrome plated finish |
|
|
Billet License Plate Frame $40.99 Cobra Billet License Plate Frame The license plate is probably the single ugliest piece of sheetmetal on any bike. At least you can dress it up with a Cobra frame. CNC machined plated in show chrome Small Size: 4.5'' x 7'' |
|
|
Patent It Yourself: Your Step-By-Step Guide to Filing at the U.S. Patent Office $41.81 Patent your creation with the world's bestselling guide to patents Have a world-class idea? Ready to protect your invention from copycats? Then turn to the best resource available-- "Patent It Yourself." Attorney David Pressman takes you through the entire patent process, providing scrupulously updated information and clear instructions to help you: determine if you can patent your invention understand patent law evaluate the commercial potential of your idea perform your own patent search file a provisional patent application prepare a formal patent application respond to patent examiners amend an application enforce and maintain your patent market and license your invention Thoroughly updated to reflect the latest changes in intellectual property law, the 15th edition also provides the latest U.S. Patent and Trademark Office rules and forms. It includes up-to-date details on how to file a patent electronically with the USPTO, the latest rules for application and prosecution, and other changes to technical filing rules. Whether you're new at the inventing game or a grizzled veteran, "Patent It Yourself" will save you grief, time and money. |
|
|
Patent Searching Made Easy: How to Do Patent Searches on the Internet & in the Library $33.92 Inventor? Find out if you're the first to file a patent, online and in the library. In the past, if you wanted to assess the novelty of an idea, you had to wade through the patent database at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in Virginia -- or hire a lawyer to do a patent search for $500 and up. The cost and inconvenience of these searches often meant that good ideas were left to rot on the vine. In Patent Searching Made Easy, find the plain-English information you need to: verify the patent status of an idea search Patent and Trademark Depository Libraries use online patent search services A physicist, engineer, and patent searching expert, author David Hitchcock gives you the vocabulary, instructions and strategies you need to search for a patent quickly and easily. He explains how the PTO classifies different types of inventions, so that you can assign your idea to the right class, compare it to related ideas and then determine if it's novel enough to qualify for a patent. Patent Searching Made Easy shows you how do patent searches yourself, on the Internet, at little or no cost. Plus, you'll learn how to: prepare for online searches with the right hardware, software and computer skills access online patent searching resources narrow online searches with keywords and Boolean logic perform database searches at Patent and Trademark Depository Libraries (PTDLs) do microfiche searches at PTDLs search fee-based patent databases on the Internet search international patent offices do advanced searches at the PTO and PTDL Written for both inventors and business owners interested in expanding their product line through the license, distribution or manufacture of other people's ideas, Patent Searching Made Easy is the easiest way for you to determine the answer to that all-important question, "Am I the first?" |
|
|
Math Wizard Site License (Single School Site) $299 Create and print math worksheets and answer keys with just a few clicks of the mouse! This easy-to-use software quickly creates worksheets for addition, subtraction, division, multiplication, currency, fractions, measurement conversions, and time. Each worksheet can be customized by specifying number range, use of positive and negative numbers, appearance, and more. System Requirements CD-ROM Drive 5MB of available space128MB of RAMorCompatible with Windows and Macintosh computers.This is a site license for a single school site. |
